Level 1) 2) 3) 4) 5) 6) 7) 8) | Electors 5,367,378 1,073,478 214,698 42,942 8,590 1,718 346 70 | Selected 1,073,475 214,695 42,939 8,588 1,718 343 69 14 | Unselected 4,293,903 858,783 171,759 34,354 6,872 1,375 277 56 |
In this example, after groups were assigned at each level, any remaining participants were carried to the next level as described in Devilish Details.
Fred
2 comments:
I cannot, at first sight, see anything aginst groups of five and it would seem to negate the fears of Urbano.
The groups are still small enough to enable face-to-face meetings with little effort or expense.
In addition, groups of five reduces the number of levels in the process, speeding things up and possibly being cheaper.
I'd like to hear your take on this Fred.
Regards
Roy
Thanks, Roy
I've copied your comment to (what I call) the "upper" level as "More on Groups of Five" and responded to it there.
I don't like to see thoughtful posts like yours buried as a comment. I'll be happy to add you and any other thoughtful posters as additional authors so they can always post at the "upper" level.
Fred
Post a Comment